Tuesday, May 7, 2013

Hold causality and confirm the accident grade

Hold causality and confirm the accident grade
In the article of the accident grade asserts that should be rejected to damage the consequence indirectly, author put forward assert the intersection of malpractice and grade should reject, damage derivatized to continue, send, damage with laws and regulations dealing with, determining opportunity make clear view of regulation directly. I agree to see to the latter all without exception, this has reflected laws and regulations are rigorous and guaranteeing to determine the opportunity has regulations to abide by. But assert to the accident grade that should reject and have different views to damage the view of the consequence indirectly, wish to discuss with the counterpart.Direct damage and statement that is damaged indirectly of the malpractice are not rigorous enough. " the medical the intersection of crash handling and regulations" made toward malpractice definition, medical organization and their until medical treatment move medical worker, violate the health care and manage law, administrative statute, department's rule and make a diagnosis to attend to the norm, routine, the fault causes the accident that patient's life damages. Among them, form an important important document of malpractice, the fault causes the patient's life to damage, namely it has causality with the fault that the patient's life is damaged.Because of the damage of the property with damaging indirectly legally directly, and will damaged and divided is it extant interests to damage the target into, it is obviously improper that it is damaged but extend this to malpractice life. It was the patient's health even life that damaged in the malpractice, are all the patient's extant interests. Here can only distinguish malpractice, associated with cause and effect of the fault intensity. Reach case in the article specifically, I think it should distinguishes to be the intersection of patient and death and electronic the intersection of intestines and mirror check, initiate, form the intersection of intestinal perforation and fault, concerned with degree. This's compensate for and investigate the basis of responsibility.In medical crash handling, should distinguish the difference between ranks and accident responsibility of the accident, the higher the rank that it might not be the accident is, the greater the responsibility of hospital and doctor is. Malpractice cause is complicated, the course is varied, damage the result and have nothing in common with each other especially. Can say so, any damage result was all facilitated by many kinds of factors. Die as the article involves the case patient, just cause intestinal perforation by the fact that the electronic intestines mirror checks the fault, initiate filling the air peritonitis, infective shock, infect in the serious courtyard, and patient seriously malnutritive facilitating by the intersection of organism and the intersection of resistance and many kinds of factors such as being extremely low itself have." medical crash handling regulations " and judging the standard to accident grade in the related file " hierarchical standard of malpractice ", come, fix according to severity to damage result, damage result serious accident rank high. This accords with principle that our country grades about the accident to stipulate, traffic accident, incident were all graded according to this principle, can't be according to the malpractice grade only while just handling the malpractice, a important one see medical negligent act until malpractice damage the intersection of responsibility and intensity in the consequence and malpractice damage consequence and patient have relation of disease between the state originally. This has clear provisions in article 49 of " regulations ".So, in the expert's conclusion of the malpractice, should not merely make the conclusion of the accident grade, even more should define medical negligent act and life damage between the consequence storing causality and medical negligent act in damage the responsibility intensity in the the consequence in the malpractice. I propose consulting the traffic accident and appraising the method, defining in the expert's conclusion of the malpractice the hospital should bear the proportion of responsibility.(Author's unit: Group of law-enforcing supervision that the branched channel in Sichuan Province county is sanitary Wang XiHong)With the enhancement of health consciousness, people pay more and more attention to with the life closely bound up health problem, such as the food security, medical treatment is ensured, medical information,etc., healthy life should be from understanding information begins!More excellent health information please enter:News channel
|

0 comments:

Post a Comment